Main Search Premium Members Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 44 docs - [View All]
Ram Prasad Ahir And Ors. vs State on 16 October, 1958
Bhanwar Singh & Ors vs State Of M.P on 16 May, 2008
Arjun vs State Of Maharashtra on 3 May, 2012
Omanakuttan @ Keerikkadan vs State on 21 October, 2009
Radhe vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 7 July, 2008

[Complete Act]
User Queries
Try out our Premium Member services: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Service and an ad-free experience. Free for one month and pay only if you like it.
Central Government Act
Section 98 in The Indian Penal Code
98. Right of private defence against the act of a person of unsound mind, etc.—When an act, which would otherwise be a certain offence, is not that offence, by reason of the youth, the want of maturity of understanding, the unsoundness of mind or the intoxication of the person doing that act, or by reason of any misconception on the part of that person, every person has the same right of private defence against that act which he would have if the act were that offence. Illustrations
(a) Z, under the influence of madness, attempts to kill A; Z is guilty of no offence. But A has the same right of private defence which he would have if Z were sane.
(b) A enters by night a house which he is legally entitled to enter Z, in good faith, taking A for a house-breaker, attacks A. Here Z, by attacking A under this misconception, commits no offence. But A has the same right of private defence against Z, which he would have if Z were not acting under that misconcep­tion.