Main Search Premium Members Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 8 docs - [View All]
Data Infosys Ltd. And Ors. vs Infosys Technologies Ltd. on 5 February, 2016
United Biotech Pvt. Ltd. vs Orchid Chemicals & ... on 18 May, 2012
M/S South Thindis vs M/S Billion Smiles Hospitality ... on 17 July, 2012
M/S Bhagwan Dass Khanna Jewellers vs Bhagwan Das Khanna Jewellers Pvt ... on 8 March, 2017
Stokely Van Camp Inc & Anr vs Heinz India Private Ltd. on 3 September, 2012

[Section 124(1)(b)] [Section 124(1)] [Section 124] [Complete Act]
Try out the Virtual Legal Assistant to take your notes as you use the website, build your case briefs and professionally manage your legal research. Also try out our Query Alert Service and enjoy an ad-free experience. Premium Member services are free for one month and pay only if you like it.
Central Government Act
Section 124(1)(b)(ii) in The Trade Marks Act, 1999
(ii) if no such proceedings are pending and the court is satisfied that the plea regarding the invalidity of the registration of the plaintiff’s or defendant’s trade mark is prima facie tenable, raise an issue regarding the same and adjourn the case for a period of three months from the date of the framing of the issue in order to enable the party concerned to apply to the Appellate Board for rectification of the register.