Main Search Premium Members Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 76 docs - [View All]
Mangilal Jawanmal And Ors. vs The Special Land Acquisition ... on 29 August, 1977
Kacheru vs Risal Singh on 21 April, 1970
State Of Karnataka vs Laxuman on 25 October, 2005
Craft Centre And Ors. vs The Koncherry Coir Factories, ... on 7 July, 1990
S.M.Chandrasekaran vs S.S.Jayamani on 23 April, 2007

[Section 18] [Complete Act]
Try out the Virtual Legal Assistant to take your notes as you use the website, build your case briefs and professionally manage your legal research. Also try out our Query Alert Service and enjoy an ad-free experience. Become a Premium Member for free for three months and pay only if you like it.
Central Government Act
Section 18(2) in The Limitation Act, 1963
(2) Where the writing containing the acknowledgment is undated, oral evidence may be given of the time when it was signed; but subject to the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872), oral evidence of its contents shall not be received. Explanation.—For the purposes of this section,—
(a) an acknowledgment may be sufficient though it omits to specify the exact nature of the property or right, or avers that the time for payment, delivery, performance or enjoyment has not yet come or is accompanied by a refusal to pay, deliver, perform or permit to enjoy, or is coupled with a claim to set-off, or is addressed to a person other than a person entitled to the property or right;
(b) the word “signed” means signed either personally or by an agent duly authorised in this behalf; and
(c) an application for the execution of a decree or order shall not be deemed to be an application in respect of any property or right.