Main Search Premium Members Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 2 docs
Gurmukh Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab on 24 May, 2011
Radhakishan Narayandas ... vs Manmohan Garg on 19 February, 1991

[Complete Act]
User Queries
Try out the Virtual Legal Assistant to take your notes as you use the website, build your case briefs and professionally manage your legal research. Also try out our Query Alert Service and enjoy an ad-free experience. Premium Member services are free for one month and pay only if you like it.
Central Government Act
Section 103 in The Trade And Merchandise Marks Act, 1958
103. Preliminary advice by the Registrar as to distinctiveness.
(1) The Registrar may, on application made to him in the prescribed manner by any person who proposes to apply for the registration of a trade mark in Part A or Part B of the register, give advice as to whether the trade mark appears to him prima facie to be inherently adapted to distinguish, or capable of distinguishing, as the case may be.
(2) If, on an application for the registration of a trade mark as to which the Registrar has given advice as aforesaid in the affirmative made within three months after the advice was given, the Registrar, after further investigation or consideration, gives notice, to the applicant of objection on the ground that the trade mark is not adapted to distinguish, or is not capable of distinguishing, as the case may be, the applicant shall be entitled, on giving notice of withdrawal of the application within the prescribed period, to have repaid to him any fee paid on the filing of the application.