Main Search Premium Members Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 3779 docs - [View All]
Union Of India And Another vs Tulsiram Patel And Others on 11 July, 1985
Moti Ram Deka Etc vs General Manager, N.E.F. ... on 5 December, 1963
State Of Uttar Pradesh And Anr. vs Dr. Prem Behari Lal Saxena on 23 May, 1968
Satyavir Singh And Others vs Union Of India And Others Etc. Etc on 12 September, 1985
Delhi Transport Corporation vs D.T.C. Mazdoor Congress on 4 September, 1990

[Article 311] [Constitution]
Try out the Virtual Legal Assistant to take your notes as you use the website, build your case briefs and professionally manage your legal research. Also try out our Query Alert Service and enjoy an ad-free experience. Premium Member services are free for one month and pay only if you like it.
Central Government Act
Article 311(2) in The Constitution Of India 1949
(2) No such person as aforesaid shall be dismissed or removed or reduced in rank except after an inquiry in which he has been informed of the charges against him and given a reasonable opportunity of being heard in respect of those charges Provided that where it is proposed after such inquiry, to impose upon him any such penalty, such penalty may be imposed on the basis of the evidence adduced during such inquiry and it shall not be necessary to give such person any opportunity of making representation on the penalty proposed: Provided further that this clause shall not apply
(a) where a person is dismissed or removed or reduced in rank on the ground of conduct which has led to his conviction on a criminal charge; or
(b) where the authority empowered to dismiss or remove a person or to reduce him in rank ins satisfied that for some reason, to be recorded by that authority in writing, it is not reasonably practicable to hold such inquiry; or
(c) where the President or the Governor, as the case may be, is satisfied that in the interest of the security of the State, it is not expedient to hold such inquiry