Main Search Premium Members Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 2 docs
The State Of Maharashtra And Etc. ... vs Saeed Sohail Sheikh Etc. Etc on 2 November, 2012
Manohar vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr on 13 December, 2012

Try out the Virtual Legal Assistant to take your notes as you use the website, build your case briefs and professionally manage your legal research. Also try out our Query Alert Service and enjoy an ad-free experience. Premium Member services are free for one month and pay only if you like it.
Punjab-Haryana High Court
M/S King Steel Rolling Mill vs Punjab State Electricity Board ... on 20 August, 2009
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh


Civil Revision No. 3713 of 2001 (O&M)

Date of decision: August 20, 2009

M/s King Steel Rolling Mill
                                                          .. Petitioner

                   Vs.

Punjab State Electricity Board and another
                                                          .. Respondents

Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: None for the petitioner.

Dr. Puneet Kaur Sekhon, Advocate for the respondent No.1.

A.N. Jindal, J Having scrutinized the impugned judgment, it does not transpire any such defect, illegality or irregularity suggesting interference by this Court. However, to my mind, learned Additional District Judge, Patiala, has awarded interest on the higher side, therefore, the same needs to be modified.

In view of the observations made above, this petition is dismissed with the modification that the petitioner would be entitled to interest @ 12% per annum. However, the remaining terms of the award shall remain intact.

August 20, 2009                                           (A.N. Jindal)
deepak                                                          Judge