Main Search Premium Members Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 42 docs - [View All]
Sarjug Devi And Anr. vs Bhamar Lal Pugalia on 19 February, 1982
Narendra Nath Mitter vs Rampal Singh on 18 April, 1946
199Th Report On Unfair (Procedural And Substantive) Terms In ...
Municipal Corporation ... vs M/S. Shantikunj Investment Pvt. ... on 28 February, 2006
Municipal Corporation ... vs M/S. Shantikunj Investment Pvt. ... on 28 February, 2006

[Complete Act]
User Queries
Try out the Virtual Legal Assistant to take your notes as you use the website, build your case briefs and professionally manage your legal research. Also try out our Query Alert Service and enjoy an ad-free experience. Become a Premium Member for free for three months and pay only if you like it.
Central Government Act
Section 67 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872
67. Effect of neglect of promisee to afford promisor reasonable facilities for performance.—If any promisee neglects or refuses to afford the promisor reasonable facilities for the performance of his promise, the promisor is excused by such neglect or refusal as to any non-performance caused thereby. —If any promisee neglects or refuses to afford the promisor reasonable facilities for the performance of his promise, the promisor is excused by such neglect or refusal as to any non-performance caused thereby." Illustration A contracts with B to repair B’s house. B neglects or refuses to point out to A the places in which his house requires repair. A is excused for the non-performance of the contract, if it is caused by such neglect or refusal.