Main Search Premium Members Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 86 docs - [View All]
Dhananjay Kumar Singh vs State Of Rajasthan on 19 April, 2006
Neelesh Jain vs State Of Rajasthan on 20 December, 2005
Pawan Duggal vs State on 24 April, 2001
Bhikubhai Anakbhai Bayal vs State Of Gujarat, Thro P.P. on 10 January, 2007
Jagdish Prasad Sharma And Anr. vs State Of Bihar And Anr. on 19 February, 1987

[Complete Act]
Try out our Premium Member services: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Service and an ad-free experience. Free for one month and pay only if you like it.
Central Government Act
Section 91 in The Indian Penal Code
91. Exclusion of acts which are offences independently of harm caused.—The exceptions in sections 87, 88 and 89 do not extend to acts which are offences independently of any harm which they may cause, or be intended to cause, or be known to be likely to cause, to the person giving the consent, or on whose behalf the consent is given. Illustration Causing miscarriage (unless caused in good faith for the purpose of saving the life of the woman) is an offence independently of any harm which it may cause or be intended to cause to the woman. Therefore, it is not an offence “by reason of such harm”; and the consent of the woman or of her guardian to the causing of such miscarriage does not justify the act.