Main Search Premium Members Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 331 docs - [View All]
B.N. Shankarappa vs Uthanur Srinivas And Ors on 21 January, 1992
Rajaram vs State Of M.P. on 17 December, 2014
B.C. Patel And Co. vs Sales Tax Officer And Anr. on 12 April, 1955
Doongarsee And Sons And Ors. vs State Of Gujarat And Ors. on 25 April, 1969
Vitthaldas S/O Balkisan Gandhi vs The State Of Maharashtra, Through ... on 28 January, 1993

[Complete Act]
Try out the Virtual Legal Assistant to take your notes as you use the website, build your case briefs and professionally manage your legal research. Also try out our Query Alert Service and enjoy an ad-free experience. Become a Premium Member for free for three months and pay only if you like it.
Central Government Act
Section 4 in The General Clauses Act, 1897
4 Application of foregoing definitions to previous enactments. —
(1) The definitions in section 3 of the following words and expressions, that is to say, “affidavit”, “barrister”, 3 [***] “District Judge”, “father”, 3 [***], 4 [***], 3 [***] “immovable property”, “imprisonment”, 3 [***] “Magistrate”, “month”, “movable property”, “oath”, “person”, “section”, “son”, “swear”, “will”, and “year” apply also, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context, to all 5 [Central Acts] made after the third day of January, 1868, and to all Regulations made on or after the fourteenth day of January, 1887.
(2) The definitions in the said section of the following words and expressions, that is to say, “abet”, “Chapter”, “commencement”, “financial year”, “local authority”, ‘‘master”, “offence”, “part”, “public nuisance”, “registered”, “schedule”, “ship”, “sign”, “sub-section” and “writing” apply also, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context, to all 5 [Central Acts] and Regulations made on or after the fourteenth day of January, 1887.