Main Search Premium Members Advanced Search Disclaimer
Cites 2 docs
Constituent Assembly Debates On 15 June, 1949 Part I
Constituent Assembly Debates On 15 June, 1949 Part Ii
Citedby 57 docs - [View All]
Arvind Mills Ltd., Ahmedabad vs State Of Gujarat And Ors. on 21 July, 1965
Mohammed Ajmal Mohammad vs The State Of Maharashtra on 21 February, 2011
K.Jagadeesachandran Nair vs E.K.Mamomohanan Pandarathil
M/S.Triven Garments Ltd vs State Represented By on 5 June, 2015
Manager, Court Of Wards Estate vs The Commissioner Of Income Tax on 17 December, 1963

[Constitution]
User Queries
Try out the Virtual Legal Assistant to take your notes as you use the website, build your case briefs and professionally manage your legal research. Also try out our Query Alert Service and enjoy an ad-free experience. Premium Member services are free for one month and pay only if you like it.
Central Government Act
Article 296 in The Constitution Of India 1949
296. Property accruing by escheat or lapse or as bona vacantia Subject as hereinafter provided any property in the territory of India which, if this Constitution had not come into operation, would have accrued to His Majesty or, as the case may be, to the Ruler of an Indian State by escheat or lapse, or as bona vacantia for want of a rightful owner, shall, if it is property situate in a State, vest in such State, and shall, in any other case, vest in the Union: Provided that any property which at the date when it wouldhave so accrued to His Majesty or to the Ruler of an Indian State was in the possession or under the control of the Government of India or the Government of a State shall, according as the purposes for which it was then used or held were purposes of the Union or a State, vest in the Union or in that State Explanation In the article, the expressions Ruler and Indian State have the same meanings as in Article 363