Main Search Premium Members Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 13 docs - [View All]
Ravi Lalwani And Anr. vs Alvin Will Cure Laboratories Pvt. ... on 15 September, 2006
Pachranga Syndicate Pvt. Ltd. vs Som Nath & Anr. on 25 January, 2010
Eveready Industries India ... vs Subrata Das & Ors on 24 April, 2009
M/S Saurabh Agrotch (P) Ltd vs M/S Motive Agro Oils Pvt. Ltd. & ... on 10 November, 2009
Pachranga Syndicate Pvt. Ltd. vs N. Kheri Gram Udyog Mandal & Anr. on 25 January, 2010

[Complete Act]
Try out our Premium Member services: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Service and an ad-free experience. Free for one month and pay only if you like it.
Central Government Act
Section 133 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999
133. Preliminary advice by the Registrar as to distinctiveness.—
(1) The Registrar may, on application made to him in the prescribed manner by any person who proposes to apply for the registration of a trade mark, give advice as to whether the trade mark appears to him prima facie to be distinctive.
(2) If, on an application for the registration of a trade mark as to which the Registrar has given advice as aforesaid in the affirmative made within three months after the advice was given, the Registrar, after further investigation or consideration, gives notice to the applicant of objection on the ground that the trade mark is not distinctive, the applicant shall be entitled, on giving notice of withdrawal of the application within the prescribed period, to have repaid to him any fee paid on the filing of the application.