Main Search Premium Members Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 9 docs - [View All]
Sreematy Bajroga Khatun And Ors. vs Province Of Bengal And Ors. on 24 May, 1939
Aparna Trading Corporation (I) ... vs Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes ... on 28 June, 1982
Pierce Leslie & Co. Ltd vs Violet Ouchterlony Wapshareand ... on 20 December, 1968
Dr. Zubida Begum vs Indian Bank on 28 August, 2012
Poonam Garg vs The Chief Manager, State Bank Of ... on 10 January, 2014

[Section 20] [Complete Act]
Try out our Premium Member services: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Service and an ad-free experience. Free for one month and pay only if you like it.
Central Government Act
Section 20(3) in The Limitation Act, 1963
(3) For the purposes of the said sections,—
(a) an acknowledgment signed or a payment made in respect of any liability by or by the duly authorised agent of, any limited owner of property who is governed by Hindu law, shall be a valid acknowledgment or payment, as the case may be, against a reversioner succeeding to such liability; and
(b) where a liability has been incurred by or on behalf of a Hindu undivided family as such, an acknowledgment or payment made by, or by the duly authorised agent of, the manager of the family for the time being shall be deemed to have been made on behalf of the whole family.