Main Search Premium Members Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 881 docs - [View All]
Hiralal Maganlal And Co. vs Dcit, Sr-52 on 20 September, 2004
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. vs Doon Apartments (P) Ltd. on 7 July, 1978
V.P. Padmanabhan Nair And Ors. vs Grasim Industries, Mavoor And ... on 22 May, 1997
Kally Nath Dutta vs Shew Bux Mohata And Anr. on 19 July, 1949
Omprakash Basantlal Goenka, ... vs Assessee on 4 May, 2016

[Complete Act]
Try out the Virtual Legal Assistant to take your notes as you use the website, build your case briefs and professionally manage your legal research. Also try out our Query Alert Service and enjoy an ad-free experience. Premium Member services are free for one month and pay only if you like it.
Central Government Act
Section 115 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
115 Estoppel. —When one person has, by his declaration, act or omission, intentionally caused or permitted another person to believe a thing to be true and to act upon such belief, neither he nor his representative shall be allowed, in any suit or proceeding between himself and such person or his representative, to deny the truth of that thing. Illustration A intentionally and falsely leads B to believe that certain land belongs to A, and thereby induces B to buy and pay for it. The land afterwards becomes the property of A, and A seeks to set aside the sale on the ground that, at the time of the sale, he had no title. He must not be allowed to prove his want of title.