Main Search Premium Members Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 881 docs - [View All]
Hiralal Maganlal And Co. vs Dcit, Sr-52 on 20 September, 2004
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. vs Doon Apartments (P) Ltd. on 7 July, 1978
V.P. Padmanabhan Nair And Ors. vs Grasim Industries, Mavoor And ... on 22 May, 1997
Kally Nath Dutta vs Shew Bux Mohata And Anr. on 19 July, 1949
King Emperor vs Karri Venkanna Patrudu on 18 August, 1916

[Complete Act]
Try out the Virtual Legal Assistant to build your case briefs as you use the website and to professionally manage your legal research. Become a Premium Member and enjoy ad-free experience. Free for three months and pay only if you like it.
Central Government Act
Section 115 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
115 Estoppel. —When one person has, by his declaration, act or omission, intentionally caused or permitted another person to believe a thing to be true and to act upon such belief, neither he nor his representative shall be allowed, in any suit or proceeding between himself and such person or his representative, to deny the truth of that thing. Illustration A intentionally and falsely leads B to believe that certain land belongs to A, and thereby induces B to buy and pay for it. The land afterwards becomes the property of A, and A seeks to set aside the sale on the ground that, at the time of the sale, he had no title. He must not be allowed to prove his want of title.