Main Search Premium Members Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 239 docs - [View All]
C.G.Sasidharan vs The State Of Kerala on 6 December, 2007
Manoranjan Kumar Sinha @ Rinku ... vs State Of Jharkhand on 7 September, 2009
Tarkeshwar Singh vs State on 5 October, 2012
Rampal vs State Of U.P. on 29 September, 1978
Kamalapati Trivedi V. The State Of ... vs The State Of West Bengal on 23 July, 2016

[Complete Act]
User Queries
Try out our Premium Member services: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Service and an ad-free experience. Free for one month and pay only if you like it.
Central Government Act
Section 221 in The Indian Penal Code
221. Intentional omission to apprehend on the part of public servant bound to apprehend.—Whoever, being a public servant, legally bound as such public servant to apprehend or to keep in confinement any person charged with or liable to apprehended for an offence, intentionally omits to apprehend such person, or intentionally suffers such person to escape, or intentionally aids such person in escaping or attempting to escape from such confinement, shall be punished as follows, that is to say:— with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, with or without fine, if the person in confinement, or who ought to have been apprehended, was charged with, or liable to be apprehended for, an offence punishable with death; or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, with or without fine, if the person in confinement, or who ought to have been apprehended, was charged with, or liable to be apprehended for, an offence punishable with 1[imprisonment for life] or imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years; or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, with or without fine, if the person in confinement, or who ought to have been apprehended, was charged with, or liable to be apprehended for, an offence punishable with imprisonment for a term less than ten years.