Main Search Premium Members Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 114 docs - [View All]
State vs Prashant Aggarwal on 3 June, 2010
State vs . Sunny Goel. & Ors.- Sc No. 30 Of ... on 26 November, 2012
State vs Krishan Mohan Tripathi And Ors. Sc ... on 29 November, 2012
28. The Apex Court In A Case Of Kans ... vs . State Of Punjab on 8 February, 2011
State vs . Jai Parkash & Anr. on 13 October, 2014

[Complete Act]
User Queries
Try out the Virtual Legal Assistant to take your notes as you use the website, build your case briefs and professionally manage your legal research. Also try out our Query Alert Service and enjoy an ad-free experience. Premium Member services are free for one month and pay only if you like it.
Central Government Act
Section 113 in The Indian Penal Code
113. Liability of abettor for an effect caused by the act abetted different from that intended by the abettor.—When an act is abetted with the intention on the part of the abettor of causing a particular effect, and an act for which the abettor is liable in consequence of the abetment, caused a different effect from that intended by the abettor, the abettor is liable for the effect caused, in the same manner and to the same extent as if he had abetted the act with the intention of causing that effect, provided he knew that the act abetted was likely to cause that effect. Illustration A instigates B to cause grievous hurt to Z. B, in consequence of the instigation, causes grievous hurt to Z. Z dies in conse­quence. Here, if A knew that the grievous hurt abetted was likely to cause death, A is liable to be punished with the punishment provided for murder. CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENCE Punishment—Same as for offence committed—According as offence abetted is cognizable or non-cognizable—According as offence abetted is bailable or non-bailable—Triable by court by which offence abetted is triable—Non-compoundable.