Main Search Premium Members Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 767 docs - [View All]
Shantilal Ambalal Mehta vs M.A. Rangaswamy on 22 April, 1977
Vinayakrao S. Desai vs Interlink Petroleum Ltd. And Ors. on 1 March, 2001
Dr.T.Gnanasambanthan vs The Board Of Governors on 31 January, 2014
Nepal Chandra Banerji vs Commercial Tax Officer And Ors. on 4 March, 1977
A'Bad Cotton Mfg. Co. Ltd. Etc. vs Union Of India And Ors. on 13 April, 1977

[Article 226] [Constitution]
Try out the Virtual Legal Assistant to take your notes as you use the website, build your case briefs and professionally manage your legal research. Also try out our Query Alert Service and enjoy an ad-free experience. Premium Member services are free for one month and pay only if you like it.
Central Government Act
Article 226(3) in The Constitution Of India 1949
(3) Where any party against whom an interim order, whether by way of injunction or stay or in any other manner, is made on, or in any proceedings relating to, a petition under clause ( 1 ), without
(a) furnishing to such party copies of such petition and all documents in support of the plea for such interim order; and
(b) giving such party an opportunity of being heard, makes an application to the High Court for the vacation of such order and furnishes a copy of such application to the party in whose favour such order has been made or the counsel of such party, the High Court shall dispose of the application within a period of two weeks from the date on which it is received or from the date on which the copy of such application is so furnished, whichever is later, or where the High Court is closed on the last day of that period, before the expiry of the next day afterwards on which the High Court is open; and if the application is not so disposed of, the interim order shall, on the expiry of that period, or, as the case may be, the expiry of the aid next day, stand vacated