Main Search Premium Members Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 4 docs
Data Infosys Ltd. And Ors. vs Infosys Technologies Ltd. on 5 February, 2016
Mrs. Rajnish Aggarwal & Ors. vs M/S. Anantam on 26 November, 2009
Stokely Van Camp Inc & Anr vs Heinz India Private Ltd. on 3 September, 2012
M/S South Thindis vs M/S Billion Smiles Hospitality ... on 17 July, 2012
Man Mohan Sharma vs Manjit Singh on 22 December, 2016

[Section 124(1)] [Section 124] [Complete Act]
User Queries
Try out the Virtual Legal Assistant to take your notes as you use the website, build your case briefs and professionally manage your legal research. Also try out our Query Alert Service and enjoy an ad-free experience. Premium Member services are free for one month and pay only if you like it.
Central Government Act
Section 124(1)(b) in The Trade Marks Act, 1999
(b) the defendant raises a defence under clause (e) of sub-section (2) of section 30 and the plaintiff pleads the invalidity of registration of the defendant’s trade mark, the court trying the suit (hereinafter referred to as the court), shall,—
(i) if any proceedings for rectification of the register in relation to the plaintiff’s or defendant’s trade mark are pending before the Registrar or the Appellate Board, stay the suit pending the final disposal of such proceedings;
(ii) if no such proceedings are pending and the court is satisfied that the plea regarding the invalidity of the registration of the plaintiff’s or defendant’s trade mark is prima facie tenable, raise an issue regarding the same and adjourn the case for a period of three months from the date of the framing of the issue in order to enable the party concerned to apply to the Appellate Board for rectification of the register.