Main Search Premium Members Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 219 docs - [View All]
Sabmiller India Ltd vs M.P. Beer Products Pvt. Ltd on 13 February, 2014
M/S Rspl Ltd. vs Mukesh Sharma & Anr. on 5 April, 2016
Indian Performing Rights Society ... vs Sanjay Dalia & Anr on 1 July, 2015
Intas Pharmaceuticals Limited vs Allergan Inc. on 24 July, 2006
M/S Lakhan Pal Shaym Kumar vs M/S Ram Prasad Gupta & Anr. on 24 May, 2012

[Complete Act]
Try out the Virtual Legal Assistant to take your notes as you use the website, build your case briefs and professionally manage your legal research. Also try out our Query Alert Service and enjoy an ad-free experience. Premium Member services are free for one month and pay only if you like it.
Central Government Act
Section 134 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999
134. Suit for infringement, etc., to be instituted before District Court.—
(1) No suit—
(a) for the infringement of a registered trade mark; or
(b) relating to any right in a registered trade mark; or
(c) for passing off arising out of the use by the defendant of any trade mark which is identical with or deceptively similar to the plaintiff’s trade mark, whether registered or unregistered, shall be instituted in any court inferior to a District Court having jurisdiction to try the suit.
(2) For the purpose of clauses (a) and (b) of sub-section (1), a “District Court having jurisdiction” shall, notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) or any other law for the time being in force, include a District Court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction, at the time of the institution of the suit or other proceeding, the person instituting the suit or proceeding, or, where there are more than one such persons any of them, actually and voluntarily resides or carries on business or personally works for gain. Explanation.—For the purposes of sub-section (2), “person” includes the registered proprietor and the registered user.